{"id":399,"date":"2026-05-30T20:32:29","date_gmt":"2026-05-30T20:32:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sanfranciscomovingguide.com\/?p=399"},"modified":"2026-05-30T20:32:29","modified_gmt":"2026-05-30T20:32:29","slug":"thousands-of-vacant-homes-could-soon-trigger-a-hefty-new-tax-in-california-city","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sanfranciscomovingguide.com\/?p=399","title":{"rendered":"Thousands of vacant homes could soon trigger a hefty new tax in California city"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

One of California\u2019s largest cities will decide next week on whether to tax property owners annually for homes left vacant more than half the year.\u00a0<\/p>

Read more Record-breaking rain may delay start of peak fire season for Bay Area<\/a><\/p><\/div>

\"\"<\/div>

San Diego residents will vote on Measure A next week, a controversial tax that would charge homeowners if their properties are vacant for more than 182 days a year. If passed, it would go into effect in 2027 and charge up to $8,000 the first year and $10,000 the next, with additional fees for commercial property owners. All the revenue would go into the city\u2019s general fund.\u00a0<\/p><\/div>

<\/div>

It could amount to that qualify for the tax, the measure says, resulting in about $24 million generated each year.\u00a0<\/p><\/div>

San Diego has been hit hard by a housing shortage in the past decade, while home prices nearly doubled. Backers say the measure would help return some of these vacant homes to the market.<\/p><\/div>

Opponents, meanwhile, argue that the law would be an invasion of privacy and that there\u2019s no guarantee the tax would help address the city\u2019s housing shortage.<\/p><\/div>

The measure has spawned a fierce battle among voters, with coalitions throwing tens of thousands of dollars in support of and against the measure. Supporters have spent just over $280,000, mainly from labor unions, while the opposition has funneled more than $1.3 million in efforts to defeat it, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported. The bulk of that opposition money comes from real estate groups, including both the California and the national associations of Realtors.\u00a0<\/p><\/div>

<\/div>

Should it pass, these opposition groups have also pledged to legislate against it.\u00a0<\/p><\/div>

Several other California cities have passed legislation taxing vacant homes in the past decade to varying levels of success. Oaklanders approved a vacant property tax in 2018 \u2014 defined as in use less than 50 days in a calendar year \u2014 of up to $6,000 for a residential property. Berkeley implemented an \u201cempty homes tax\u201d in 2024, taxing property owners up to $12,000 for units that are vacant for more than 182 days, though some landlords have skipped out on paying millions in taxes in hopes that the law is struck down in court.\u00a0<\/p>

Read more Viral OnlyFans model Kamryn Renae rescued off Mount Whitney hike<\/a><\/p><\/div>

\n
\"image\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>

The Bay Area’s best free newsletter.<\/div><\/h2>
Stay informed, and entertained.<\/div><\/div><\/div>